![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
teddogSlow day at the office, waiting for materials and whatnot. I've been trying to get a slimmed down version of Coppermine up and running on Signal Loss. It seems to be coming along, although I'm going to have to dig to disable the rating system, since it's messing with my layout.
Small rant: I really don't like it in fandom when the non-words "molestable" or "rapeable" are used to describe an actor or a character. It's so... wrong.
We know what rape is. What does molest mean?
1. To disturb, interfere with, or annoy.
2. To subject to unwanted or improper sexual activity.
Yeah, in many cases where it's a character, we're dealing with a fictional thing. If you like non-con, that's your own thing. It seems to be a kink that's becoming very popular in areas of fandom, probably for the same reason incest is: It's "racy" and whatnot and slash and BDSM have been done. Buuuut... threatening molestion against another human, like an actor, with intent to carry out that action, is pretty wrong. I'm also willing to group younger characters under this "Wrong!" catagory. You don't walk up to a 4 year old on the street and tell the mother "Ooo! He's so rapeable!" That's grounds for being arrested.
If you wanna do someone, fictional or otherwise, then just say that. "I'd jump his bones" or whatever else works. Talking about molesting them, in the true sense of the word, hints that you are lacking confidence; that you believe that the object of your affection will not give you a second look, so you need to rape them in order to get what you want. That or you want sex slaves and I'm not sure where the law stands on that.
The sad thing is you see "molestable" a lot refering to geeky or socially awkward characters, which seems to be sort of insulting. Why is it assumed that a nerd will refuse sex, so you need to force yourself on them? This isn't fanfic and odds are, they aren't going to suddenly enjoy it at the end. Is it wrong somehow to call a geek sexy in the true sense, instead bringing them down to "It's only fun if you take advantage of them"? We have sex drives too, you know.
Meeeeeeh I'm done.
Small rant: I really don't like it in fandom when the non-words "molestable" or "rapeable" are used to describe an actor or a character. It's so... wrong.
We know what rape is. What does molest mean?
1. To disturb, interfere with, or annoy.
2. To subject to unwanted or improper sexual activity.
Yeah, in many cases where it's a character, we're dealing with a fictional thing. If you like non-con, that's your own thing. It seems to be a kink that's becoming very popular in areas of fandom, probably for the same reason incest is: It's "racy" and whatnot and slash and BDSM have been done. Buuuut... threatening molestion against another human, like an actor, with intent to carry out that action, is pretty wrong. I'm also willing to group younger characters under this "Wrong!" catagory. You don't walk up to a 4 year old on the street and tell the mother "Ooo! He's so rapeable!" That's grounds for being arrested.
If you wanna do someone, fictional or otherwise, then just say that. "I'd jump his bones" or whatever else works. Talking about molesting them, in the true sense of the word, hints that you are lacking confidence; that you believe that the object of your affection will not give you a second look, so you need to rape them in order to get what you want. That or you want sex slaves and I'm not sure where the law stands on that.
The sad thing is you see "molestable" a lot refering to geeky or socially awkward characters, which seems to be sort of insulting. Why is it assumed that a nerd will refuse sex, so you need to force yourself on them? This isn't fanfic and odds are, they aren't going to suddenly enjoy it at the end. Is it wrong somehow to call a geek sexy in the true sense, instead bringing them down to "It's only fun if you take advantage of them"? We have sex drives too, you know.
Meeeeeeh I'm done.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 05:10 pm (UTC)Well most of the time anyway. XD
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 05:29 pm (UTC)Didn't's you hear? Those are NORMAL now. You can pick up your "mainstream" button with the het and gen writers.
Except during periods and stuff. Because that's like, icky time. That's when the sap is good.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 01:37 pm (UTC)Yeah but like sap like 25/7.^^
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 02:00 pm (UTC)Awesome Lust icon, BTW. She's such an
lovableevil bitch. I love my little figure of her - oh, and her eyes are red in the manga, which explains the odd paint job:http://groups.msn.com/FullMetalAlchemist/chapter39.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=4886
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 03:48 pm (UTC)Why thank you, I made that icon. *preens* Yeah she certainly is, she on my fvaourite top ten character list especially in the manga.
Her eyes are red? Then are the rest of their eyes are purple or are they red too? I always thought it was nifty that the rest of them except Pride had the same color of eyes practially.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 04:21 pm (UTC)http://groups.msn.com/FullMetalAlchemist/fullmetalalchemistartbook.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=2758
This is all very confusing. o___O
I thought it was a little silly having all of their eyes purple, with Envy beening a plothole; in his "true form" in the anime, his eyes are gold. I'm guessing that it's a carry over from his orignal form, but that doesn't explain why Sloth and Lust have purple eyes when we know that Trisha and Scar's sister-in-law didn't. Lust's should have been red, given where she was from. Trisha... I don't remember in her case, since she was probably onscreen for fivem mintues.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 07:36 pm (UTC)I do believe that Al had his mother's eyes so....